Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Saroj vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 41506 of 2019 Petitioner :- Smt. Saroj Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Tripurari Pal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Petitioner and respondent No.4 are alleged to be wife and husband but they are living separately. The grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent No.4 is threatening her and is not allowing her to live peacefully at any place. In the event, respondent No.4 is doing any offence by threatening or by interfering in the life of the petitioner, she may lodge an FIR against him or make a complaint to the concerned Magistrate, whereupon necessary action would be taken in accordance with law, if necessary, against the respondent No.4.
The writ petition, for the above purpose, is misconceived and stands disposed of, accordingly.
Order Date :- 19.12.2019 LN Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Saroj vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Tripurari Pal