Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7922 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sarnam Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Bijai Nath Yadav,Prem Prakash Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Anand Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Bijai Nath Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent no.2 / Addl. Commissioner (Administration), Jhansi Division, Jhansi to decide the Revision no.14/23 of 2000-01 (Shanker Singh Vs. Land Management Committee and others), under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, within a stipulated period.
The learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending, it be disposed of by giving appropriate direction to the authority concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no.2 / Addl. Commissioner (Administration), Jhansi Division, Jhansi to decide the Revision no.14/23 of 2000-01 (Shanker Singh Vs. Land Management Committee and others), under Section 333 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act, either on the next date fixed, but not later than 3 months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall not seek any adjournment and so also is expected from the private respondents in the pending case, except for strong and compelling reasons, else would attract an exemplary cost of not less than Rs.250/- payable to the other side.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 N.S.Rathour