Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Sarfarazul Haq And Others vs State Of U.P. & Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|15 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. The present 482 Cr.P.C. petition has been filed for quashing the proceedings of Case No. 6536 of 2008 (State Vs. Sarfarazul Haw and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 285 of 2008, under Section 506 I.P.C., Police Station Civil Lines, District Aligarh, pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, District Aligarh as well as to quash the charge sheet dated 25.07.2008.
The contention of the counsel for the applicants is that no offence against the applicants is disclosed and the present prosecution has been instituted with a malafide intention for the purposes of harassment. He pointed out certain documents and statements in support of his contention. It is further contended that the applicants are bonafide purchaser for value and filing of charge sheet against them is nothing but misuse of the process of law. From the perusal of the material on record and looking into the facts of the case at this stage it cannot be said that no offence is made out against the applicants. All the submission made at the bar relates to the disputed question of fact, which cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C. At this stage only prima facie case is to be seen in the light of the law laid down by Supreme Court in cases of R.P. Kapur Vs. State of Punjab, A.I.R. 1960 S.C. 866, State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 426, State of Bihar Vs. P.P.Sharma, 1992 SCC (Cr.) 192 and lastly Zandu Pharmaceutical Works Ltd. Vs. Mohd. Saraful Haq and another (Para-10) 2005 SCC (Cr.) 283. The disputed defence of the accused cannot be considered at this stage. Moreover, the applicants have got right of discharge under Section 239 or 227/228 Cr.P.C. as the case may be through a proper application for the said purpose and they are free to take all the submissions in the said discharge application before the Trial Court. The prayer for quashing the proceedings as well as charge sheet is refused. However, since all the charged Sections are bailable, it is directed that the applicants shall appear before the court below within 30 days from today and apply for bail, their prayer for bail shall be considered and decided as expeditiously as possible, in accordance with law, if possible on the same day by the Court below. For a period of 30 days from today or till the disposal of the application for grant of bail whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. However in case the applicants do not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, coercive action shall be taken against them.
With the aforesaid directions, this application is finally disposed off. Order Date :- 15.6.2010 S.Ali
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sarfarazul Haq And Others vs State Of U.P. & Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
15 June, 2010