The writ petitioners claims that they are the owner of the subject property, but however, patta was issued in the names of third and fourth respondents. Aggrieved over the action of the second respondent - Tahsildar, the writ petitioner preferred an appeal before the first respondent - Revenue Divisional Officer. On the basis of the appeal, the Revenue Divisional Officer has issued proceedings in Na Ka.344/2014/C, dated 20.12.2014, directing the Tahsildar to produce the records. In spite of the same, the Tahsildar has not produced any records. Thereafter, an enquiry notice was issued on 24.12.2014, followed by another notice dated 24.08.2015. But, the second respondent - Tahsildar has not produced any records.
2. On behalf of the respondent nos.1 and 2, Ms.K.Bhunaveswari, learned Government Advocate takes notice and submitted that suitable instructions will be issued to the second respondent - Tahsildar for production of documents before the first respondent - Revenue Divisional Officer, to complete the enquiry and for disposal of the proceedings in NaKa.No.344/2014/C, dated 20.12.2014.
3. Recording the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate and considering the limited prayer sought for to dispose of the proceedings in NaKa.No.344/2014/C, dated 20.12.2014, this Court consider it fit to give a direction to the second respondent - Tahsildar, to produce the relevant records, before the first respondent, pertaining to the enquiry, within a period of four weeks from today and on receipt of such records, the first respondent is directed to complete the enquiry and dispose of the above proceedings, within a period of twelve weeks thereafter.
21.06.2017 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Note : Issue order copy on 22.06.2017 mm/tk
M.GOVINDARAJ, J.
mm/tk To
1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, G.S.T.Road, Madurantagam-603 306. Kanchipuram District.
2. The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Madurantagam Taluk, Kanchipuram Dist.
Pin-603 306.
W.P. No. 15616 of 2017
21.06.2017
http://www.judis.nic.in