IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.3664/2016(KLR-RES) BETWEEN 1. SMT. SARASWATHAMMA @ SARASAMMA AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, W/O. LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY, 2. SRI. BHOOMI REDDY AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY, 3. SRIRAMA REDDY AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY, 4. SMT. BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, D/O. LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY, 5. SMT. MANJULA AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, D/O. LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY, 6. SMT. GAJALAKSHMI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, D/O. LATE VENKATASWAMY REDDY, ALL ARE RESIDING AT HOMMADEVANAHALLI VILLAGE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-571 009, AND ALL ARE REPRESENTED BY THEIR GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER D.M. PURNESH.
... PETITIONERS (BY SRI G PAPI REDDY, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE DISTRICT, BANGALORE-562 110.
2. THE TAHASILDAR BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK, BANGALORE-562 110.
3. SMT. PEDDAKKA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, W/O. LATE RAMAIAH, 4. SRI. KRISHNA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, S/O. VENKATASWAMY, 5. SRI. SRINIVAS AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, S/O. VENKATASWAMY, 6. SMT. PARVATHI AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, D/O. VENKATASWAMY, 7. SRI. PEDDANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, S/O. LATE ANANTHA BHOVI, 8. SMT. GOWRAMMA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, W/O. LATE RAMASWAMY, 9. SRI. HANUMANTHAPPA AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, S/O. LATE ANANTHA BHOVI, RESPONDENTS 3 TO 9 ARE RESIDING AT DINNEPALYA, HOMMADEVANAHALLY DHAKALE, BEGUR HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK-571 109. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.S.MAHANTESH, AGA FOR R1 & R2, SRI M.L.GOWDA, ADVOCATE FOR R3, R4, R8 & R9 R5 AND R6 ARE SERVED AND REPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO PASS ORDERS ON THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS ON 8.1.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-F IN RRT (Dis) 48/2008-09 OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE DIRECT THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO PUT UP THE RECORDS OF THE EARLIER PROCEEDINGS AND HEAR THE PETITIONERS BEFORE PROCEEDING TO PASS ORDER IN THE PENDING CASE AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Petitioners herein are seeking direction to respondent No.2 to pass orders on the application filed by them on 8.1.2016 vide Annexure-F in proceedings bearing No.RRT (Dis) 48/2008-09 and for other alternative reliefs.
2. To-day when this matter is taken up for preliminary hearing the learned counsel for respondent Nos.3, 4, 8 and 9 would file a memo along copy of the final order passed in proceedings bearing No.RRT (Dis) 48/2008-09 on 26.7.2018. He would further bring to the notice of this Court that the very same petitioners have already filed an appeal against the said order in RA.No.108/2018-19 on the file of Assistant Commissioner, Bengaluru South Sub Division, Bengaluru. With this, it is stated that the present writ petition has become infructuous.
3. On going through the said memo and documents filed along with it, this Court would observe that in the light of subsequent developments the present writ petition does not survive for consideration as it has become infructuous.
4. Accordingly, the memo filed along with the documents is taken on record and the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
nd/-
Sd/- JUDGE