When this Criminal Original Petition was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the second respondent, have filed a joint compromise memo dated 09.01.2017, duly signed by the petitioner, second respondent and the counsel for the petitioner, in which it is stated that the petitioner and the second respondent have now arrived at a consensus and decided to part ways decently; that the second respondent is not willing to marry the petitioner and both of them have decided to settle all their issues among themselves. It is also stated in the joint compromise memo that the second respondent is not willing to pursue the complaint any further.
2. Both the parties are present. Their identities have been verified and they accepted the contents in the joint compromise memo as true and genuine.
3. The joint compromise memo is recorded and the same shall form part of this order. In view of the joint compromise memo, the proceedings in C.C.No.15 of 2016 pending on the file of the Judicial Magistrate-I, Tiruvannamalai, against the petitioner, is quashed, and the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of in terms of the joint compromise memo. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Index : Yes/No 20.02.2017 Internet : Yes/No KM To
1. The Inspector of Police, All Women Police Station, Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.
2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai-600 104.
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
KM Crl.O.P.No.14224 of 2016 and Crl.M.P.No.7218 of 2016 20.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in