Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sarandha vs State Of U P & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 36021 of 2004 Petitioner :- Sarandha Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Smt. Manju R. Chauhan Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"i. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Ceritorari quashing Advertisement dated 22.2.2004 (Annexure No. 1 to the writ petition) made by respondent no. 2.
ii. issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing respondents to provisionally admit the petitioner for Vishistha B.T.C. Training."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sarandha vs State Of U P & Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 August, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Smt Manju R Chauhan