IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 6TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT APPEAL NO.1396 OF 2016 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
SAPTHASHRI SOUHARDHA CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED, NO.7, 3RD STAGE, DATTAGALLI, MYSURU-570 005, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER SRI S. ADISHESHA.
(BY SMT. SAI APABHARANA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI G.K.V. MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND:
...APPELLANT 1. THE COMMISSIONER MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSMI BAI ROAD, MYSURU-570 005.
2. THE MEMBER (PLANNING) MYSURU URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, JHANSI RANI LAKSMI BAI ROAD, MYSURU-570 005.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI T.P. VIVEKANANDA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI P.S. MANJUNATH, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 AND R-2) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.03.2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO.36271 OF 2013 (LB-RES) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ALLOW THE SAID WRIT PETITION.
***** THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the respondents enclosing a copy of the order passed by respondent –MUDA canceling the site in question. In view of the same, nothing further survives for consideration in this appeal.
2. The appeal is dismissed as being infructuous with a liberty to the appellant to challenge the order dated 2-12-2019, in a manner known to law.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE Rsk/-