Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Santosh Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|30 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 9307 of 2019 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Parvez Alam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ashish Mishra
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anil Babu, learned counsel for the State-respondents.
This petition impugns notices issued by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra calling upon the petitioner to cooperate in an enquiry which has been instituted in respect of missing judicial records. Presently and as this Court reads these notices, no disciplinary action has been initiated against the petitioner who has admittedly retired from service.
In view thereof, the Court finds no ground to either entertain the writ petition or to interfere with the notices which have been issued. The petitioner having retired from the concerned judgeship is obliged to cooperate in the enquiry which is being undertaken by the Chief Judicial Magistrate. In this case, no cause of action arises presently since no adverse action has been taken.
The petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 30.5.2019/Arun K. Singh (Yashwant Varma, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Santosh Kumar Yadav vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
30 May, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Parvez Alam