Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Santosh Kumar Sonkar vs Naib Tehsildar City And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|19 December, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 39
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 42298 of 2018 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Sonkar Respondent :- Naib Tehsildar City And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ajay Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned standing counsel for State - respondents.
By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for issuing a writ of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1, the Naib Tehsildar, City, Jaunpur, to decide the petitioner's Mutation Case No. T-201614360407159 (Santosh Kumar Sonkar Vs. Shyama Devi), expeditiously.
No useful purpose will be served in keeping the writ petition pending. This writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 1, the Naib Tehsildar, City, Jaunpur, to decide the petitioner's Mutation Case No. T-201614360407159 (Santosh Kumar Sonkar Vs. Shyama Devi), in accordance with law, within a period of 2 months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.
It is made clear that the Court has not adjudicated the claim of the petitioner on merits.
Order Date :- 19.12.2018 Amit Mishra
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Santosh Kumar Sonkar vs Naib Tehsildar City And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
19 December, 2018
Judges
  • Piyush Agrawal
Advocates
  • Ajay Singh