Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Santosh Chaurasia @ Santosh Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8115 of 2021 Applicant :- Santosh Chaurasia @ Santosh Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kripa Shanker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mata Pher
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
1. Heard Mr. Kripa Shanker Pandey, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
2. This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant-Santosh Chaurasia @ Santosh Kumar in connection with Case Crime No.32 of 2020, under Section 308, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Lotan, District- Siddharth Nagar.
3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and upon perusal of material brought on record as well as complicity of accused and also judgment of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019 SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
4. Accordingly, the present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 6.4.2021 YK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Santosh Chaurasia @ Santosh Kumar vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Kripa Shanker Pandey