Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.A.No.882 Of 2 vs V.Natesa Gurukkal

Madras High Court|22 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the Second Appeal came up for hearing on 20.03.2017, there was no representation for the appellant and hence, it was directed to be listed under the caption "for dismissal" today (22.03.2017). Even today, when the matter is called, there is no representation for the appellant either in person or through counsel. Hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs.
22.03.2017 cs Copy to
1. The Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam.
2. The District Munsif, Nagapattinam.
3. The Record Keeper, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras.
4. Arulmigu Muthu Mariamman Temple, Velippalayam rep. by the Executive Officer, Arulmigu Sattanatha Swami Temple, Nagapattinam.
S.A.No.882 of 2011 22.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.A.No.882 Of 2 vs V.Natesa Gurukkal

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 March, 2017