Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sanju Baistava @ Sanju Khan And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|16 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 16820 of 2021 Applicant :- Sanju Baistava @ Sanju Khan And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Matter taken up in the revised list. No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press this anticipatory bail application.
Sri Raj Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the State is present.
Even previously the matter was listed on 1.12.2021 and there was no representation on behalf of the applicants.
The present anticipatory bail application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 16.12.2021 M. ARIF (Samit Gopal, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sanju Baistava @ Sanju Khan And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
16 December, 2021
Judges
  • Samit Gopal
Advocates
  • Mukesh Kumar Maurya

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.