Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Sanjeev Srivastava vs State Of U.P., Thru. Prin. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Vedpal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Advocate.
Under challenge in the instant writ petition is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 78 of 2010, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 & 471 IPC, police station Umribeghumganj, district Gonda.
We have gone through the contents of the FIR, which disclose commission of cognizable offence, as such, the same cannot be quashed. The writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. However, it is provided that if petitioner surrenders and moves application for bail the same shall be considered and decided expeditiously by the courts below.
Order Date :- 23.6.2010 Pradeep/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sanjeev Srivastava vs State Of U.P., Thru. Prin. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 June, 2010

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.