Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sanjeev Kumar And Anuj vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 May, 2019

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
The petitioners are aggrieved by the realization of additional fee under Rules 32 and 81 of the Central Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 as amended vide notification No.G.S.R. dated 29.12.2016 which has not been implemented in the State of U.P. as per the order of the Transport Commissioner dated 29th April, 2019.
Learned counsel for the petitioners presses that the matter may be heard on merits as regards the validity of the notification dated 29.12.2016.
Learned Standing Counsel as well as Sri R.K. Jaiswal, learned Counsel for the Union of India may file counter affidavit within six weeks.
List thereafter along-with WRIT - A No. - 8904 of 2019 ( Kamini Tandon And 5 Others Vs. State Of U.P. And 4 Others .
Order Date :- 31.5.2019 Pramod Tripathi
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sanjeev Kumar And Anuj vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 May, 2019
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
  • Prakash Padia