Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sanjay Kumar Gupta vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|21 August, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 10
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 27897 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sanjay Kumar Gupta Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Satya Prakash Sharma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Vikram Nath,J.
Hon'ble Daya Shankar Tripathi,J.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. K. Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents.
By means of this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner has prayed for an appropriate writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to appoint the petitioner as an Assistant Government Advocate (Criminal). In our considered opinion, such a relief cannot be granted in the writ jurisdiction as it does not relate to enforcement of any fundamental right of the petitioner.
The petition is accordingly dismissed.
Order Date :- 21.8.2018 lakshman [Daya Shankar Tripathi, J.] [Vikram Nath, J.]
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sanjay Kumar Gupta vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
21 August, 2018
Judges
  • Vikram Nath
Advocates
  • Satya Prakash Sharma