IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 12TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR WRIT APPEAL NOs.185-202/2015 (S – RES) BETWEEN:
SANJAY GANDHI INSTITUTE OF TRAUMA AND ORTHOPAEDICS BYRASANDRA, JAYANAGAR EAST BENGALURU-560 011 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR.
… APPELLANT (BY SRI D.R.P. BABU, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. Dr.V GUBBI AGED 58 YEARS SON OF LATE S. NAGARAJU No.99, BULL TEMPLE ROAD BENGALURU-560 019.
2. Dr.H S CHANDRASHEKAR AGED 54 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI SUNNE GOWDA No.281, PADMANABHANAGAR MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU-560 080.
3. Dr.PUTTARAJU, AGED 50 YEARS SON OF LATE SRI M MUDALAGIRI GOWDA No.270, 5TH CROSS, 15TH MAIN RMV EXTENSION BENGALURU-560 080.
4. Dr.PARTHASARATHY AGED 60 YEARS SON OF SRI K. RAMASWAMY No.325, 6th MAIN, KHB COLONY 1ST STAGE, BASAVESHWARANAGAR BENGALURU-560 079.
5. Dr.RAVISHANKAR AGED 54 YEARS SON OF SRI GOPALAKRISHNA “SRINIDHI”, 805/1, 15TH CROSS KANAKAPURA ROAD JAYANAGAR 7TH BLOCK WEST BENGALURU-560 082.
6. Dr.NIRANJAN GOWDA AGED 50 YEARS SON OF LATE M L RAJANNA No.79, 14TH MAIN JAYANAGAR 4TH BLOCK BENGALURU-560 011.
7. Dr.SHIVKUMAR AGED 47 YEARS SON OF SRI R SHIVANNA No.75, 80 FEET ROAD RMV II STAGE OPP: TO M.S.RAMAIAH HOSPITAL, BENGALURU-560 094.
8. Dr.PRAKASAPPA AGED 50 YEARS SON OF SRI RANGAPPA No.49, 17TH MAIN 2ND CROSS, BTM I STAGE BENGALURU -560 068.
9. Dr.GOMATHY AGED 53 YEARS SON OF SRI RAMASWAMY PILLAI, No.3A PALM TREE PLACE APARTMENTS PALM GROVE ROAD BENGALURU -560 047.
10. Dr.SHIVALINGAIAH AGED 57 YEARS SON OF SRI PUTTE GOWDA No.28, NELE 29TH MAIN ROAD BTM II STAGE BENGALURU – 560 076.
11. Dr.MADAN BALLAL AGED 45 YEARS SON OF SRI H. D. BALLAL No.35, 2ND MAIN ROAD GANGANAGAR BENGALURU -560 032.
12. Dr.AVINASH AGED 38 YEARS SON OF SRI PARTHASARATHY No.308, PALLAVA TERRACE APARTMENTS, NORTH MAIN ROAD, OPP:YEDIYUR LAKE JAYANAGAR 6TH BLOCK BENGALURU -560 082.
13. Dr.BASAVARAJ S K AGED 39 YEARS SON OF SRI SARANAPPA No.23, 3RD CROSS OPP PARVATHI HOMES VEERABHADRANAGAR STAGE-I BENGALURU -560 003.
14. Dr.CHIDANAND, KJC AGED 35 YEARS SON OF SRI CHANDRASHEKAR K J No.546, 8TH MAIN ROAD 4TH BLOCK, KORAMANGALA BENGALURU -560 034.
15. Dr.MOHAN N S AGED 35 YEARS SON OF LATE SHIVRAM No.424, A5 KRISHNA BLOCK NATIONAL GAMES VILLAGE KORAMANGALA BENGALURU -560 034.
16. Dr.LAKSHMI K. S. AGED 35 YEARS DAUGHTHER OF SRI SUBRAYA SHARMA No.1905, SOUTH END C ROAD JAYANAGAR 9TH BLOCK BENGALURU -560 069.
17. Dr.MALATHI ANIL KUMAR AGED 40 YEARS DAUGHTER OF Dr.K MAHADEV No.421, 18TH MAIN JAYANAGAR 4TH T BLOCK BENGALURU -560 041.
18. Dr.ABHINANDAN PATEL AGED 37 YEARS SON OF SRI NIRANJAIAH K R No.53, A BLOCK, RELIANCE MANSION, HARIRAMDAS LAYOUT, VIJAYNAGAR BENGALURU -560 040.
19. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001.
20. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, 105, 1ST FLOOR VIKAS SOUDHA BENGALURU -560 001. ..RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SRINIVASA FOR SRI ANIRUDH ANAND, ADVOCATES FOR R5 TO R10, SRI LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGA FOR R19 & R20, R2, R4, R11, R12, R14, R15, R16 & R18 ARE SERVED & UNREPRESENTED, VIDE ORDER DATED 23.8.2017, SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R3 IS COMPLETE, VIDE ORDER DATED 16.12.2017 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R1 & R17 IS COPLETE, VIDE ORDER DATED 11.4.2019, APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED AGAINST R13) THESE WRIT APPEALS ARE FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION Nos.11120— 137/2011 DATED 29.10.2014.
***** THESE WRIT APPEALS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH.,J DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T These appeals arise out of the impugned order dated 29.10.2014 rendered on Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2014 in W.P.Nos.11120-11137 of 2011 passed by the learned Single Judge.
2. Both learned counsels, submit that the said writ petitions have been disposed off by the final order dated 15.11.2014. However, it is the contention of the learned counsel for the appellant that, the respondents have filed an application seeking certain clarifications. We are not impressed by the said arguments. When the writ petitions itself have been disposed off, the writ appeals become infructuous.
Hence, the writ appeals are dismissed as such.
Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE HR