1. This petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, with the following prayers:
"(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow this Special Civil Application.
(B) This Honourable Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ of certiorari or any other writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the order dated 24.11.2011 passed by the Secretary, Revenue Department (Vivad), State of Gujarat in Revision Application Number 6 of 2011 and the order dated 24.12.2010 passed by the Prant Officer, Deputy Collector, Viramgam Prant i.e. amendment order of Block Devision.
(C) Pending admission and final hearing the Honourable Court be pleased to stay the impugned communication dated 24.11.2011 passed by the Principal Secretary, Revenue Department (Vivad), State of Gujarat in Revision Application Number 6 of 2011 and the order dated 24.12.2010 passed by the Prant Officer, Deputy Collector, Viramgam Prant i.e. amendment order of Block Division.
(D) Pending admission and final hearing the Honourable Court be pleased to direct the Respondent Number 1 to 4 not to do any act with regard to transfer of land in any manner to any person and/or direct to maintain the status quo of the subject land.
(E) Any other reliefs as the nature and circumstances of the case may require may also be granted."
2. Heard Mr.Paresh M. Darji, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr.J.V. Vaghela, learned advocate for respondents Nos.1 to 4, and perused the averments made in the petition.
3. After arguing for some time, the learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be met, if the Special Secretary, Revenue Department (respondent No.8), is directed to decide the Revision Application preferred by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible.
4. Upon the above statement being made by the learned advocate for the petitioner, the following order is passed:
The Special Secretary, Revenue Department (respondent No.8) is directed to consider and decide the Revision Application No.6 of 2011 preferred by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible and without avoidable delay.
5. The petition is disposed of, in the above terms, without entering into the merits of the case.
(Smt.
Abhilasha Kumari, J.) rakesh/ Top