Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sangita And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 37825 of 2019 Applicant :- Sangita And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Neeraj Kumar Srivastava,Pankaj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
(Order on Criminal Misc. Correction Application) Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that in the order passed by this Court on 24.9.2019, inadvertently Section 365 I.P.C. has not been incorporated.
Criminal Misc. Correction Application No.1 of 2019 is allowed. Necessary correction has been made in the original order.
Order dated 24.9.2019 will stand corrected as follows:
In the 3rd line of 5th paragraph, "Section 365 I.P.C." should also be read along with other Sections.
As prayed by learned counsel for the applicants, the applicants are allowed a weeks' and no more further time from today to produce a certified copy of the aforesaid order before the S.S.P/S.P. concerned, who shall ensure the compliance of the order.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 Vikas
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sangita And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2019
Judges
  • Rajul Bhargava
Advocates
  • Neeraj Kumar Srivastava Pankaj Kumar