Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Sandhya Tripathi And Ors vs State Of U P And Anr

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 42
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 22971 of 2019 Applicant :- Smt. Sandhya Tripathi And 2 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
The submission is that the present proceedings are counterblast proceedings.
Case is covered by the judgment in the case of State of Haryana Vs. Bhajan Lal, 1992 Supp,(1) SCC 335 the case of the applicant is covered by 7th Category of Cases detailed in para 102 thereof.
Matter requires consideration.
Issue notice to opposite party no. 2 returnable at an early date. List thereafter.
Further proceedings in Complaint Case No. 1703 of 2018 (Prashant Dixit vs. Smt. Sandhya Tripathi and others) under Section 406 I.P.C., Police Station- Etmaddaula, District- Agra, pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 10, Agra, shall remain stayed against the applicant till the next date of listing.
Order Date :- 24.6.2019 Rohit
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Sandhya Tripathi And Ors vs State Of U P And Anr

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 June, 2019
Judges
  • Siddharth
Advocates
  • Ashutosh Pandey