Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sandhya Singh vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|31 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 25600 of 2018 Petitioner :- Sandhya Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Avinash Mani Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Yogendra Kumar
Hon'ble Pankaj Mithal,J. Hon'ble Saral Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel for the respondents.
The petitioner alleges that she has applied for registration to practice in Pharmacy. Her application is pending since 11.1.2018 which has not been considered by respondent no. 2.
In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent no. 2 to consider the above application of the petitioner, if any, pending for registration and to pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law on the representation of the petitioner dated 5.7.2018 alleged to have been sent to him by registered post most expeditiously, if possible, within a period of two month.
The writ petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 31.7.2018 SKS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sandhya Singh vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
31 July, 2018
Judges
  • Pankaj Mithal
Advocates
  • Avinash Mani Tripathi