Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Sandeepkumar Nityanand Jha vs State Of Gujarat &

High Court Of Gujarat|24 December, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

When the petitioner is called out and taken up for hearing, learned advocate for the petitioner is not present.
The cause list shows that notice has remained unserved qua respondent no.2 as the respondent no.2 was not found at the given address.
In view of remarks in the cause list, the petitioner will take necessary steps to provide correct, complete and present address of the respondent no.2 to the registry of this Court on or before 28.12.2012. Upon supply of fresh address of the respondent no.2, as aforesaid, office may issue fresh notice to the respondent no.2 (at the fresh address supplied by the petitioner), returnable on 30.1.2013.
If the correct, complete and present address of the respondent no.2 is not supplied to the registry, as aforesaid, on or before 28.12.2012, the matter may be placed for appropriate orders before the Court on 9.1.2013.
(K.M.THAKER, J.) kdc Page 2
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sandeepkumar Nityanand Jha vs State Of Gujarat &

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
24 December, 2012