Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 16042 of 2019
Petitioner :- Sandeep Kumar And Another
Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others
Counsel for Petitioner :- Mohd. Iqbal Farooqui,Sharad Malviya
Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Sharad Malviya, learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Deepak Mishra, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the impugned F.I.R. as well as material brought on record.
The relief sought in this petition is for quashing of the F.I.R. dated 23.5.2019 registered as Case Crime No. 186 of 2019, under Section 3/7 of E. C. Act, P.S. Mansoorpur, District Muzaffar Nagar.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case though no offence as has been mentioned in the F.I.R. is made out against him, hence the present F.I.R. is liable to be quashed.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for quashing of the F.I.R. which discloses cognizable offence.
The Full Bench of this Court in Ajit Singh @ Muraha v. State of U.P. (2006 (56) ACC 433) reiterated the view taken by the earlier Full Bench in Satya Pal v. State of U.P. (2000 Cr.L.J. 569) after considering the various decisions including State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (AIR 1992 SC 604) that there can be no interference with the investigation or order staying arrest unless cognizable offence is not ex-facie discernible from the allegations contained in the F.I.R. or there is any statutory restriction operating on the power of the Police to investigate a case.
From the perusal of the FIR, prima facie it cannot be said that no cognizable offence is made out. Hence no ground exists for quashing of the F.I.R. or staying the arrest of the petitioners.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Vivek Varma, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.)
Order Date :- 10.6.2019 RavindraKSingh