Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33562 of 2018 Applicant :- Sanawwar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Syed Shahnawaz Shah Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Avnish Kumar Srivastava
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
It is pointed out by Sri Avnish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the informant that Sri Syed Shahnawaz Shah had appeared on behalf of the respondent No.3 (informant) in writ petition filed by co-accused Mazid and therefore he has no authority under the Advocates' Act to appear on behalf of the accused-applicant in the same crime number.
In view of the objection raised by the learned counsel for the informant, Sri Syed Shahnawaz Shah states that he does not want to press the instant bail application.
The instant bail applicant is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
Free copy of the bail rejection order may be returned back to the learned counsel for the applicant after keeping photostat copy of the same on record.
Order Date :- 19.9.2018 Vikas