1. Ms.
Megha Chitaliya, learned AGP appears on advance copy. Earlier this Court (Coram: H.K. Rathod, J.) vide order dated 6.2.2007 passed in Special Civil Application No.3279 of 2007 and allied matters had passed the following order:-
"5. As and when the respondent No.1 herein receives the representation from the petitioners, the respondent No.1 herein is directed to consider the grievance of the petitioners and examine the same why the benefit of 4th and 5th Pay Commission has been denied though it has been recommended by the Regional Director of Municipality to the Secretary and why effective steps so far not taken by the Secretary in response to the recommendation made by the Regional Director of Municipality on 23.1.2002 and then, pass appropriate reasoned order in accordance with law, within a period of two months from the date of receiving the copy of representation from the petitioners and communicate the decision immediately to the petitioners."
2. It transpires that thereafter as the decision was not taken, the petitioners approached this Court by way of filing Misc. Civil Application No.2291 of 2011 under the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act, 1971 which came to be disposed of as the petitioner withdrew the said petition with a view to avail substantive petition for ventilating the grievances raised in the petition vide order dated 12.9.2011 of this Court (Coram: Jayant Patel, J. and R.M. Chhaya, J.). Mr. Mihra, learned advocate for the petitioner states that even till date no decision is taken as per the direction issued, as aforesaid. Hence, Ms. Megah Chitaliya to take instructions as to when the representation shall be decided. In order to enable her to do so, S.O. to 23.1.2012.
A copy of this order may be made available to Ms. Megha Chitaliya, learned AGP for its onward communication.
[R.M.CHHAYA, J.] mrpandya Top