Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sana @ Sarvan vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 May, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 52
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 15354 of 2021 Applicant :- Sana @ Sarvan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Onkar Nath Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Om Prakash-VII,J.
Heard Shri Onkar Nath, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State through video conferencing and perused the record.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has not committed the present offence. Although applicant is named in the F.I.R. but same is based on hearsay evidence. Recovery is false and planted and is not supported with independent evidence. If entire prosecution case is taken into consideration then also applicant was found present sitting in the said Car. He was not driving the car. Criminal cases shown as criminal history have been duly explained through supplementary affidavit. He is languishing in jail since 15.12.2020 and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.
On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
Let the applicant Sana @ Sarvan involved in Case Crime No.
235 of 2020, under Sections 392, 411 IPC, P.S. Jasrathpur, District - Etah be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions.
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant will not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.
The party shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad. The concerned Court / Authority / Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 11.5.2021 Sanjeet Digitally signed by Justice Om Prakash Date: 2021.05.11 14:10:42 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sana @ Sarvan vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
11 May, 2021
Judges
  • Om Prakash Vii
Advocates
  • Onkar Nath