Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sampati vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 9
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 31539 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sampati Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Ramesh Chandra Upadhyay
Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J.
This writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent no. 2 (Tehsildar Sadar District Azamgarh) to decide revenue case no. T20131506014638 Sampati versus Rampati and others under Section 176 Z.A. Act early specific period preferably within one month"
The petitioner is aggrieved because his partition suit filed in the year 2013 has not been decided finally till date.
Perusal of the order sheet appended to the writ petition reveals that although written statement has been filed, issues have not been framed.
It therefore, follows that the parties are yet to adduce their evidence.
Under the circumstances, this writ petition is disposed of with the observation that the respondent no.2 i.e. Tehsildar, Tehsil Sadar District Azamgarh may endeavour to decide the partition suit expeditiously, preferably within a period of 12 months from the date of certified copy of this order is filed before him.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 sweta
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sampati vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2019
Judges
  • Anjani Kumar Mishra
Advocates
  • Vinod Kumar Yadav