Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Samimbanu vs State

High Court Of Gujarat|29 March, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

By way of present application, filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant has prayed to release him on regular bail in connection with CR No.I-171 of 2010 registered with Dani Limbda Police Station, for the offence punishable under Sections 450, 143, 147, 148, 149, 506(2), 294(B) and 302 of IPC.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and Mr.L.B.Dabhi, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State.
It is to be noted that applicant is a lady accused and other accused was arrested in reference to the said FIR and at the end of trial, they were acquitted. But as the applicant was absconding, he was subsequently arrested. Hence, by imposing strict condition, she can be released on bail. In view of this, without entering into the merits of the case, prima facie, this Court is of the opinion that this is a fit case to exercise the discretion to enlarge the applicant on bail.
Hence, the applicant is ordered to be released on bail in connection with CR No.I-171 of 2010 registered with Dani Limbda Police Station for the offence alleged against him in this application on his executing a bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) with one solvent surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court and subject to the conditions that he shall -
a) not take undue advantage of his liberty or abuse his liberty;
b) not to try to tamper or pressurise the prosecution witnesses or complainant in any manner;
c) maintain law and order and should cooperate the Investigating Officer;
d) not act in a manner injurious to the interest of the prosecution;
e) not leave the State of Gujarat without prior permission of the Sessions Judge concerned;
f) mark presence before the Surat Rural Police Station once in a month more particularly between 1st and 10th of month between 10.00 a.m. and 2.00 p.m. for six months;
g) furnish the address of his residence to the Investigating Officer and also to the Court with documentary proof of residence at the time of execution of the bond and shall not change the residence without prior permission of this Court;
h) surrender his passport, if any, to the lower Court within a week.
If the breach of any of the above conditions is committed, the concerned Court will be free to issue warrant or take appropriate action in the matter.
Bail before the lower Court having jurisdiction to try the case. It would be open to the trial Court concerned to give time to furnish the solvency certificate if prayed for. Rule is made absolute. Direct service is permitted.
At the trial, the trial court shall not be influenced by the observations of preliminary nature, qua the evidence at this stage, made by this Court while enlarging the applicant on bail.
[M.D.SHAH,J.] radhan Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Samimbanu vs State

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
29 March, 2012