Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned Additional Government Advocate representing the State and perused the record of the case.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 624 of 2020, under Section 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station-Kotwali Shamli, District-Shamli during the pendency of trial.
It is submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that as per the prosecution case on 17.12.2020, 125 gms. of charas is said to have been recovered from the possession of one Naseem. Thereafter F.I.R. of Case Crime No. 620 of 2020 was registered by the Police alleging inter alia that in that case applicant was succeeded in fleeing away from the place of spot. Thereafter on the next date on 18.12.2020 the applicant was apprehended by the Police in the present case and has been implicated showing recovery of 125 gms. of Charas from the applicant. The main substratum of argument of learned counsel for the applicant is that the aforesaid recovery is below commercial quantity, therefore, provisions of Section 37 of N.D.P.S. Act are not attracted in the present case. It is next submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that the aforesaid recovery is not supported by any independent public witness, therefore, possibility of false implication of the applicant cannot be ruled out. It is next submitted that the guidelines laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court with regard to arrest of any person by the police has not strictly been followed in the present case and the sampling of the alleged contraband substance has not been done in this case in accordance with standing order. It is also submitted that the applicant has a criminal history of one case being Case Crime No. 368 of 2012 under Section 294 I.P.C. which was disposed of after imposing fine upon the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 18.12.2020 and in case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.
Per contra, learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage therefore, the applicant does not deserve any indulgence. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will misuse the liberty of bail.
Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused, submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, I am of the view that the applicant has made out a fit case for bail. Hence, the bail application is hereby allowed.
Let the applicant Sameer @ Islam Mansuri, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-
(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.
(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.
(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
(v) The applicant shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad.
(vi) The computer generated copy of this order shall be self attested by the counsel of the party concerned.
(vii) The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
It is clarified that anything said in this order is limited to the purpose of determination of this bail application and will in no way be construed as an expression on the merits of the case. The trial court shall be absolutely free to arrive at its independent conclusions on the basis of evidence led unaffected by anything said in this order.
Order Date :- 22.2.2021 Sunil Kr. Gupta