Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Samarth Saxena vs Nirankar Saxena & Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|10 May, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the present habeas corpus petition has been filed on behalf of petitioner who is minor aged about 3 years through Mr. Pradeep Kumar Saxena who is maternal grandfather (Nana). He further contended that mother of the petitioner was killed by his father and other grand parents since the demand of dowry could not be fulfilled. His father is in jail under Section 498-A, 304-B and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act. His life is not safe in the hands of opposite party No.2 and other family members. Since they are accused in the aforesaid criminal case no. 291 of 2009.
Issue notices to opposite parties No. 1and 2 returnable at an early date.
List on 26th May, 2010 before appropriate/regular Court.
By that date reply may be filed on behalf of respondents no. 1 and 2 and by learned A.G.A.
Order Date :- 10.5.2010 Sunil Kr Tiwari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Samarth Saxena vs Nirankar Saxena & Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
10 May, 2010