Court No. - 5
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7565 of 2018 Petitioner :- Samar Nath And Another Respondent :- Indira And 21 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ravi Chandra Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Pankaj Naqvi,J.
Heard Sri Ravi Chandra Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Abhishek Shukla, the learned Standing Counsel.
This writ petition is preferred for seeking a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the court concerned to decide Case No.730 of 1987 under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act (Bhaggu vs. Smt. Indira and others), within a stipulated period.
The learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served by keeping the petition pending, it be disposed of by giving appropriate direction to the authority concerned.
The writ petition is disposed of directing the court concerned to decide Case No.730 of 1987 under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A.&L.R. Act (Bhaggu vs. Smt. Indira and others), as expeditiously as possible, preferably within 9 months from the date of production of certified copy of the order.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes that he shall not seek any adjournment and so also is expected from the private opposite parties in the mutation case, except for strong and compelling reasons, else would attract an exemplary cost of not less than Rs.250/- payable to the other side.
It is clarified that the proceedings as far as possible should not be repeatedly adjourned, merely on the ground that the Presiding Officer is busy in administrative work.
Service of certified copy of this order upon the respondent concerned shall constitute sufficient notice upon him to submit a compliance report.
The authority concerned shall submit Compliance report in Chambers on 3.4.2019 at 4:00 P.M.
Order Date :- 26.2.2018 RS