Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sam Advertising And Marketing A Proprietary Concern vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|27 May, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE G.NARENDAR W.P.No.30241/2017 (LB RES) BETWEEN SAM ADVERTISING AND MARKETING A PROPRIETARY CONCERN HAVING ITS OFFICE AT S-703, 7TH FLOOR, MANIPAL CENTRE, DICKENSON ROAD, BANGALORE-560042, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI SAM KURIAN AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS.
... PETITIONER (BY SMT. PUSHPAVENI AJITH, ADV. – ABSENT.) AND 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA VIDHANA SOUDHA VIDHANA VEEDHI BENGALURU-560001 REP BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY.
2. THE UNDER SECRETARY FOR GOVT., HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, VIDHANA VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560001.
3. BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, CORPORATION OFFICES N R SQUARE, J C ROAD BANGALORE-560002 REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI KIRAN KUMAR.T.L, AGA FOR R1 AND R2.) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT SECTION 421(3) OF THE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS ACT, 1976, ENACTED BY THE R-1, IS ILLEGAL AND ULTRA VIRES ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER 1. This Court vide order dated 18.01.2018 had granted two weeks time as a last opportunity to remove the office objections. Despite the same, even after more than a year and half since the said order was made, office objections have not yet been complied with. Such indolence cannot be condoned.
2. Today, though the matter is called out twice, there is no representation for the petitioner. It is apparent that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. In that view of the matter, writ petition is dismissed for default and non-prosecution.
KK CT-HR Sd/- JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sam Advertising And Marketing A Proprietary Concern vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
27 May, 2019
Judges
  • G Narendar