Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.
Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that after one and half month of alleged looting incident the recovery of one golden chain was shown from the applicant. He further submitted that though there are criminal history of the applicant also in which applicant was falsely implicated, which has been disclosed in para 13 of the affidavit. The prayer for bail of co-accused Ateeq has already been allowed on 7.6.2010 in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No.14191 of 2010 from whom 450 gm. gold was recovered. He further submitted that applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail, will cooperate with the trial and he will not indulge in any such activities if he is released on bail. In the present case, the applicant is in jail since 9.3.2010.
In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on merit, let the applicant Saleem Pathan be enlarged on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in Case Crime No. 80 of 2010, under Section 379/411 IPC, P.S. Railway Road, District Meerut with the condition that applicant will appear by first week of each month at the police station concerned for supervision and to watch his conduct and behaviour.
Order Date :- 25.6.2010 Pramod