Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Saleem Ahmad vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43875 of 2021 Applicant :- Saleem Ahmad Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Vivek Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Anil Kumar Ojha,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
This bail application has been filed by the applicant Saleem Ahmad seeking bail in Case Crime No. 296 of 2021 of 2021, under Section 3 (1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention), Act, Police Station Bilaspur, District Rampur, during pendency of trial.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that only one case has been shown in the gang chart against the applicant, wherein the applicant has been granted bail by competent court. He further submitted that the applicant is innocent and he has not committed the alleged offence. Applicant is neither member of any gang nor he threatened any person nor has created a condition of insecurity in the society. Applicant has explained criminal history in para 15 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. He next submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 24.08.2021.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Nature of accusation, evidence collected by I.O. in support of the charge, gravity of offence, complicity of accused, nature and severity of punishment, in case of conviction and all other attending circumstances were duly considered.
Considering the rival submissions of the learned counsel for the parties, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon merits of the case, a case for bail is made out.
The bail application is accordingly allowed.
Let the applicant Saleem Ahmad be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.
2. The applicant shall co-operate with the trial and shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for charge, evidence when the witnesses are present in the court, statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. and argument.
3. During trial, he shall not indulge in any criminal activities.
In breach of any condition enumerated above, Trial Court shall be at liberty to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.
Order Date :- 22.12.2021 v.k.updh.
Digitally signed by ANIL KUMAR OJHA Date: 2021.12.23 13:20:21 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Saleem Ahmad vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 December, 2021
Judges
  • Anil Kumar Ojha
Advocates
  • Vivek Kumar Mishra