Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 35676 of 2003 Petitioner :- Sakha Rani Tyagi Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru' Secy. Lucknow And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Madhusudan Dixit Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Madhusudan Dixit, learned counsel for petitioner states that he has no instructions in the matter. No other counsel has appeared on behalf of petitioner to press this writ petition despite having been called in revise. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following relief:
"to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 1.8.2003 (Annexure-2 to the writ petition)."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also relief sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting relief, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 23.8.2018 Siddhant Sahu