Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sajan And Another vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|13 August, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 47
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25993 of 2021 Applicant :- Sajan And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Akhil Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Naveen Srivastava,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned AGA for the State.
The accused- applicants are involved in Case Crime No. 199 of 2021, under Section 307 IPC, registered at Police Station Tirwa, District Kannauj.
Learned counsel for the applicants have submitted that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case when they were arrested by the police on 11.05.2021. He further submits that in the police encounter case, in which the applicants are said to have fired upon the police personal, but no police personal have sustained any gun shot injury. It is also submitted that the recovery of illegal weapons, which was shown from the possession of the applicants is absolutely false as no such recovery was made from their possession. It is further submitted that there is no independent witness to corroborate the recovery, which are said to have been made from the possession of the applicants. He lastly submits that so far as other criminal cases are concerned and they have been explained in para- 10 and para- 11 of the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. The applicants are in jail since 11.05.2021, undertakes that they will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the prayer of bail but could not dispute the argument made by learned counsel for applicants.
Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, perusal of record and considering the complicity of accused, severity of punishment as well as totality of facts and circumstances, at this stage without commenting on the merits of the case, I find it a fit case for bail. However, any observation made hereinabove, will not affect the trial of the case.
Let the applicants, Sajan and Saroj involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail on their executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicants will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicants will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicants will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicants will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court unless their personal appearance are exempted through counsel by the court concerned.
5. The party shall file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court, Allahabad.
6. The computer generated copy of such order shall be self attested by counsel of the party concerned.
7. The concerned Court/ Authority/ Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court, Allahabad, and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel their bail.
Order Date :- 13.8.2021 SK Srivastava
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sajan And Another vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
13 August, 2021
Judges
  • Naveen Srivastava
Advocates
  • Akhil Kumar Shukla