Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Kerala
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Sajan Thomas vs S.I

High Court Of Kerala|09 May, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Petitioners are aggrieved by the action of the respondent in seizing vehicles owned by them and which were used for transporting red earth/other minor minerals. While crimes have been registered against them by the police authorities in connection with the offences under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1967, the grievance of petitioners in this writ petition is only with regard to the non-consideration, by the respondent, of the application preferred by them for compounding of the offences involving the vehicles.
3. Heard counsel for petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.
4. Section 23A of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and Rule 60A of the Kerala Minor Mineral Concession Rules provide for compounding of offences by the person authorised to make a complaint to the court with respect to the offence, on payment of such sum as that person may specify. The Petitioners in this writ petition have preferred such applications before the authorities competent to compound the offences. The said authorities, who are arrayed as respondent in the writ petition W.P.(C).No.12134 of 2014 2 have not, however, taken any decision in the said applications.
5. Under these circumstances, in view of the express statutory provisions, conferring on the authorities the power to compound the offences and the delay occasioned by the said authorities in disposing the applications, I dispose the writ petition with the following directions:
1. The respondents in the writ petition, before whom compounding applications have been filed, will consider the same and permit the petitioners to compound the offences on payment of Rs.25,000/- as compounding fee in respect of the vehicle seized.
3. On the offences being compounded, no prosecution shall thereafter be initiated in respect of the said offence and the vehicle shall be released to the petitioner forthwith.
4. The respondents shall comply with the above directions within two weeks from the date of production, by the petitioner, of a certified copy of this judgment.
With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of.
mns/ A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sajan Thomas vs S.I

Court

High Court Of Kerala

JudgmentDate
09 May, 2014
Judges
  • A K Jayasankaran Nambiar
Advocates
  • T P Pradeep Sri
  • P K Sathees
  • Kumar