The present revision has been filed against the order of the Judge, Small Cause in Case No. 21 of 2010 by which suit for arrears of rent and eviction filed by the respondents. has been allowed vide order dated 16.7.2011. The ejectment has been ordered on the ground of sub letting which has been proved by the respondents in the court below. In my opinion, there is no error in the order of the court below which may require further consideration by this Court. The revision is mis-conceived and is, accordingly, rejected. At this stage learned counsel for the revisionist submits that some time may be allowed to the applicant to vacate the shop in question. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the aforesaid prayer. It is, accordingly, provided that three months' time is allowed to the revisionist to vacate the shop in question. Order Date :- 25.7.2011 SKM Court No. - 4 Case :- CIVIL REVISION DEFECTIVE No. - 61 of 2011 Petitioner :- Saiyad Hasan Respondent :- Smt. Naushaba Jamal And Others Petitioner Counsel :- Pankaj Agrawal Respondent Counsel :- Vinod Sinha,Mahesh Sharma Hon'ble Abhinava Upadhya,J.
(Order on the exemption application) Office has reported that the revisionist has not filed the certified copy of the decree (formal order). Learned counsel for the revisionist has now filed certified copy of the same which is taken on record. Office is directed to give regular number to the revision. Order Date :- 25.7.2011 SKM