Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Saibul vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|06 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 89
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8186 of 2021 Applicant :- Saibul Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
Heard Mr. Sushil Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for applicant and learned A.G.A. for State.
This application for anticipatory bail has been filed by applicant Saibul, in connection with Case Crime No. 437 of 2019, under sections 376, 506 IPC, P.S. Civil Lines, District Muzaffar Nagar.
Learned A.G.A. contends that charge sheet has been submitted in aforesaid case crime number.
Having heard learned counsel for parties and upon perusal of material brought record as well as complicity of the accused and also judgement of Apex Court in P. Chidambaram Vs. Directorate of Enforcement, AIR 2019, SC 4198, this Court does not find any exceptional ground to exercise its discretionary jurisdiction under Section 438 Cr. P. C.
Accordingly, present application for anticipatory bail is rejected.
Order Date :- 6.4.2021 HSM
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Saibul vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
06 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajeev Misra
Advocates
  • Sushil Kumar Pandey