IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.26947 OF 2015 (GM-TEN) BETWEEN:
M/s.SAI ANNAPURNA BIO-PROTEINS PVT. LTD, A REGISTERED COMPANY, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT:
NO.59/A, 9-4, TEACHER COLONY, VIJAYAWADA-8, ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR Mr.V.S.PRASAD, S/O SHRI V.SUBASH CANDRA BOSE AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS ...PETITIONER (By Sri NISCHAL DEV, ADVOCATE – ABSENT-) AND:
1. THE CHIEF SECRETARY GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.
2. THE SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES, GOVERNMENT OF KARNTAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, Dr.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001.
3. THE KARNATAKA FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA UNDERTAKING), REPRESENTED BY THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, REGISTERED OFFICE AT:
HOIGE BAZAR, MANGALURU-575 001. ...RESPONDENTS (By Sri.VIJAY KUMAR.A.PATIL, AGA FOR R1 & R2; Sri O.SHIVARAMA BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR C/R3 IN CP Nos.4441/2015 & 4946/2015) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH/SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED TERMINATION OF THE TENDER/ORDER DATED 15.05.2015 ISSUED BY THE R-3 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE R-3 NOT TO INTERVENE OR MEDDLE WITH THE BUSINESS OF THE PETITIONER AT THE INDUSTRIAL PLANT OF BETHKUL, BELEKERI, KARWAR UNIT GIVEN UNDER THE TENDER.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R None appears for the petitioner.
Sri.Vijay Kumar.A.Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
Sri.O.Shivarama Bhat, learned Counsel for Caveator/ Respondent No.3 in C.P.Nos.4441 of 2015 and 4946 of 2015.
2. When the matter is taken up today at 1.30 p.m., learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of efflux of time as the petitioner has taken possession of the land in question.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, nothing survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE DH