The petitioner herein has challenged the order dated 23.05.2011 passed by the Board of Nominees-respondent no. 2 herein in Lavad Suit No. 163 of 2011 and to further direct respondent no. 2 to dispose of the Lavad Suit No. 163 of 2011 in view of withdrawal pursis Ex. 71 & 72 submitted by the respondent no. 3.
This court is of the view that the present petition is misconceived inasmuch as the appropriate remedy for the petitioner is to avail statutory remedy available by way of revision application before the competent court/Tribunal. Writ petition cannot be entertained at this stage.
If such an application is moved, the Tribunal is directed to hear the same expeditiously and decide the application within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the writ of the order of this Court. In view of the same, petition stands disposed of. Direct service is permitted.
(K.S.
JHAVERI, J.) Divya// Top