Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sahin Praveen And Others vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|05 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8440 of 2021 Applicant :- Sahin Praveen And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sanjay Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for State and perused the material available on record.
Accused-applicants - Sahin Parveen, Saba Shekh and Smt. Nikahat Aara, involved in Case Crime No.323 of 2017, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC, Police Station Kotwali, District Gorakhpur, applied for anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are innocent and have been falsely implicated in the present case for the purpose of harassment. Applicants have committed no offence. Except the present case no criminal history against them. In case, applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they shall not misuse the liberty of bail and would co-operate with the investigation. Lastly he submits that applicants are ready to approach the Court below for bail, therefore, they may be given some time to surrender before the Court below and a suitable direction be issued for considering their bail application.
Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for granting anticipatory bail and submitted that charge sheet has been filed against the applicants. He has no objection to the aforesaid request regarding the direction of bail.
Having regard to the submissions made by learned Counsel for the parties, allegation levelled against the applicants and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the applicants are not entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case, therefore, prayer is refused.
However, if the applicants surrenders before the Court concerned in aforesaid case and file bail application, the same shall be heard and decided in view of settled law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC) and judgement of Division Bench of this Court in Brahm Singh & others Vs. State of U.P.
and others, 2016 (7) ADJ 151.
For a period of one month from today or till their surrender whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants.
However, in case, the applicants does not appear before the Court below within the aforesaid period, appropriate action shall be taken against them, in accordance with law.
With the aforesaid observations, the present application is disposed of.
The applicants shall file computer generated copy of this order downloaded from the official website of Allahahad High Court. Authenticity thereof be verified by the authority concerned from the official website of this Court with a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 5.4.2021 I.A.Siddiqui
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sahin Praveen And Others vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
05 April, 2021
Judges
  • Rajendra Kumar Iv
Advocates
  • Sanjay Shukla