Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Sahid vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 53
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49746 of 2017 Applicant :- Sahid Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Chandrakesh Mishra,Daya Shankar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mohd. Monis
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Srivastava,J.
Heard Shri Sri Daya Shankar Mishra,, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Mohd. Monis, learned counsel for complainant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
Submission of learned counsel for the applicant is First Information Report of the incident has been lodged under oder of Court. Further submission is that in statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., victim has resiled from her statement of rape and has stated that only an incident of marpeet had taken place between the parties. The allegation of being sexually assaulted has been made in subsequent statement of the victim and on account of that charge-sheet has been submitted. Further submission is that criminal history of applicant has been explained in paragraph 26 of the affidavit filed in support of bail application. Applicant also undertakes that he will not misuse the liberty, if granted.
Learned counsel for first informant as well as learned AGA have vehemently opposed the prayer and submitted that Investigating Officer being under influence of applicant did not record statement of victim and other witnesses correctly. The true facts are that victim was sexually assaulted by the applicant and co-accused. Further Submission is that there is no reason of false implication.
Having heard the submission of learned counsel of both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of accusation against applicant and evidence in support of it and also that there is no likelihood of conclusion of trial in near future, I find it to be a case of bail.
Let applicant Sahid be released on bail in Case Crime No. 602 of 2016, under Sections 452, 376D, 504 and 506 I.P.C., P.S. Khaga, District Fatehpur, on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of magistrate/court concerned, subject to following conditions:-
(i) The applicant will co-operate with the trial and remain present personally on each and every date fixed for framing of charge, recording of evidence as well as recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. or through counsel on other dates and in case of absence without sufficient cause, it will be deemed that he is abusing the liberty of bail enabling the court concerned to take necessary action in accordance with the provisions of Section 82 Cr.P.C. or Sections 174A and 229A I.P.C.
(ii) The applicant will not tamper with the prosecution evidence and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.
(iii) The applicant will not indulge in any unlawful activities.
The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.
Order Date :- 27.2.2018 Neeraj
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sahid vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 February, 2018
Judges
  • Umesh Chandra Srivastava
Advocates
  • Chandrakesh Mishra Daya Shankar Mishra