Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Sahaya Cletious vs The Superintendent Of Police

Madras High Court|22 February, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This petition has been filed to direct the 2nd and 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioner under the guise of enquiry.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent police frequently called the petitioner and harassed him under the guise of enquiry.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would submit that no petition and no CSR is pending against the petitioner as on today and the petitioner's appearance is not at all required by the respondent Police. He further submitted that the respondent police did not make any harassment to the petitioner.
5. In view of the above submission made by the learned Government Advocate(Crl. Side), this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed.
To
1.The Superintendent of Police, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Inspector of Police, Kottar Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
3.The Inspector of Police, Nesamani Nagar Police Station, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.
4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sahaya Cletious vs The Superintendent Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2017