Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sahavan @ Azad vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 16686 of 2013 Applicant :- Sahavan @ Azad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- A.P. Tewari,B. Narayan Singh,S.S. Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of applicant. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. However, I myself have perused the record.
2. From the listing application filed on 15.05.2014 it is evident that recording of evidence of prosecution witnesses was over and by now probably trial must have concluded and that is why none is present to press this application.
3. Application is accordingly rejected.
Order Date :- 29.1.2019 AK
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sahavan @ Azad vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 January, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • A P Tewari B Narayan Singh S S Tripathi