Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Smt Sadhana Somani W/O Praveen Somani vs State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|25 November, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.18901/2018 (LA – KIADB) BETWEEN:
SMT.SADHANA SOMANI W/O PRAVEEN SOMANI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS R/AT No.111/1-4, SALARPURIA MELODY A BLOCK, 201, PANTARPALYA MYSORE ROAD BANGALORE-560027. …PETITIONER (BY SRI V.V.GUNJAL, ADV.) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY COMMECE & INDUSTRIES DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001.
2. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VISHVESHWARAYA MINI TOWER M.S. BUILDING, BANGALORE-560001.
3. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOMENT BOARD REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/ EXECUTIVE MEMBER 2ND FLOOR, RASHTROTHANA PARISHATH BUILDING 14/3A, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560001.
4. BANGALORE METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD., REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR BMTC COMPLEX, K.H. ROAD BANGALORE-560027. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS OF DETERMINATION OF AWARD UNDER COMMUNICATION DATED 21.04.2016 ANNEXUJRE-A0, [NO AWARD HAS BEEN SERVED ON THE PETITIONER] AND THE PROCEEDINGS IN LAC No.56/2016 PENDING ON THE FILE 2ND ADDITIONAL CITY AND CIVIL AND SESSION JUDGE CCH17, BANGALORE, INCLUDING ANY GENERAL AWARD UNDER SECTION 29 OF THE KIAD ACT LEADING TO DEPOSIT OF THE AMOUNT IN THE COURT OF THE CITY CIVIL JUDGE BANGALORE IN LAC No.33 AND 34 AND ALSO DIRECT THE CITY CIVIL COURT BANGALORE TO STRIKE OUT THE REFERENCE AND RETURN BACK THE AMOUNT TO SLAO KIADB SINCE THE SAID PROCEEDINGS ARE NOT ONLY ILLEGAL BUT HAVE BEEN MADE UNDER THE REPEALED ENACTMENT; AND ETC., THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Despite the peremptory order passed by this Court, neither there is representation on behalf of the petitioners nor the office objections are complied with. It appears that the petitioner is not serious in prosecuting the matter.
Writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE NC.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Smt Sadhana Somani W/O Praveen Somani vs State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
25 November, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha