Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Saddam vs State Of U P

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 January, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4293 of 2016 Applicant :- Saddam Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.
Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of applicant. Learned A.G.A. is present for State. However, I myself have perused the record.
2. It appears that Trial Court has concluded trial and that's why none is present to press it, therefore, by efflux of time, this application must have rendered infructuous.
3. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 29.1.2019 Siddhant Sahu
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Saddam vs State Of U P

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 January, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Sudhir Kumar Tripathi

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.