Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Sadanand vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3101 of 2019 Petitioner :- Sadanand Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents.
Although, this petition challenges and order of transfer, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would merit permitting the petitioner to represent the competent authority. Learned counsel further undertakes on instructions that the petitioner shall join the place of posting within a period of two weeks from today.
Learned Standing Counsel states that in case the petitioner joins within the period aforementioned and represents his case, the said authority shall duly evaluate the same, pass appropriate orders on the representation of the petitioner within one month from the date of receipt of the representation in accordance with law.
Accordingly and in light of the statement so made, which is recorded and accepted, nothing further survives on this petition, which shall stand disposed of.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 LA/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sadanand vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Santosh Kumar Pandey