Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Sadanand vs Addl. Commissioner (Admin) Devi ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 February, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
No notice be issued to private respondents taking into consideration the nature of order proposed to be passed.
By means of the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondent No.1 i.e. Additional Commissioner (Administration), Devi Patan Mandal, Gonda to expeditiously decide the Appeal No.C-201808000001008 in re:Sudama Prasad and ors Vs. Sadanand and ors pending since 2018.
The Court is not inclined to issue directions in a matter such as the present merely because a party has moved this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution to direct the concerned Court to decide the pending appeal overriding several cases which are equally pressing and are pending, by granting priority to a particular case. The fact that a particular case requires urgent disposal is to be considered by the concerned Court itself.
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of permitting the petitioner to move an application before the concerned Court pointing out the grounds of urgency. In the event, the petitioner does so, the concerned Court may consider whether the case should be expedited having regard to the urgency of the case.
There shall be no order as to costs.
Order Date :- 11.2.2021 Pachhere/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Sadanand vs Addl. Commissioner (Admin) Devi ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
11 February, 2021
Judges
  • Abdul Moin