Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

S.A.Damian Bastin vs The Controlling Authority And ...

Madras High Court|15 March, 2017

JUDGMENT / ORDER

With the consent of the learned counsel appearing on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal.
2.Heard Mr.T.Karunakaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent and Mr.K.Chandrasekaran, learned counsel appearing for the second respondent.
3.The petitioner is an employee of the second respondent. She has made an application to the first respondent, for payment of gratuity. As the said application is still pending consideration despite reminder dated 19.07.2016 and even though, the enquiry has been initiated, no orders have been passed and hence the present Writ Petition.
4. Considering the facts of the case and taking note of the particular fact that the enquiry is pending as per Form-O issued by the first respondent, dated 17.08.2016 and 26.09.2016 a direction is issued to the said authority to conclude the same on the application of the petitioner dated 20.01.2016 within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.
15.03.2017 pbn M.M.SUNDRESH,J.
pbn To
1.The Controlling Authority and Assistant Labour Commissioner, Government of India, Ministry of Labour and Employment Office of the Deputy Chief Labour Commissioner No.4, Haddows Road, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai  600006.
2.The Chief Executive Officer, M/s.Vik-Sandvik Design India Pvt., Ltd., 10/14, 8th Street, Gopalapuram, Chennai  600086.
O r d e r in W.P. No.40731 of 2016 15.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

S.A.Damian Bastin vs The Controlling Authority And ...

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
15 March, 2017